Nowhere did the Apostle Paul say anything in this verse, or in context, about the office of pope or an episcopal council. It does not even recognize a distinction between the classes of clergy and laity. So, Roman Catholic apologists are engaging in eisegesis here.
There is no exclusion of congregational membership involved here (i.e. "household of God"). Has the entire Christian church, therefore, been endowed the gift of infallibility by the power of the Holy Spirit? This was written to Timothy who was is in the city of Ephesus, not Rome. Is Ephesus therefore the "pillar and ground of the truth?"
Notice that Paul states he is writing so that we may know how to conduct ourselves in the church. Furthermore, he appeals to his own writing as the standard of authority. Thus, Paul is writing to Timothy (i.e. Scripture) so that he would know how to behave in the household of God. This epistle is to help us in remembering apostolic traditions.
Scripture is what defines the conduct of elders in the church. Scripture is to function as the ultimate standard of authority, especially in light of the fact that the apostles are deceased. The purpose of this letter was, and still is, to tell the church how to behave in Paul's absence. If anything at all, this passage actually supports Sola Scriptura.
It is fallacious to equate the church that supports and upholds the truth with the truth that it upholds. The church of God is simply the instrument by which the true gospel is supported and proclaimed. The church is the upholder, not the essence, of truth. The church is the custodian of the truth, not the source of truth itself.
Ironically, Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox apologists resort to this text as a defense of their respective groups. At the same time, they maintain contradictory doctrine. This passage is vague enough to be applied to any religious organization in theory.
No comments:
Post a Comment