If the Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation was taught in the church from its inception, then how come the issue was not discussed at the Jerusalem Council where the consumption of blood was frowned upon (Acts 15:20; 29; 21:25)? If the leadership who convened had actually believed in this teaching, then would they not have clarified that the blood of Christ was of a different nature in order to prevent confusion?
Thank you. https://thewordlikefire.wordpress.com/2020/04/19/the-jerusalem-council-and-roman-catholic-eucharist/
ReplyDeleteYou are welcome.
ReplyDelete