Sunday, August 12, 2018

A Refutation Of David J. Stewart's Article Titled "If Saved, Always Saved"

  • Discussion:
          -Quite simply, the purpose of this article is to address a question that David J. Stewart, author of the Independent Fundamental Baptist website called Jesus Is Savior (home to all sorts of wacky conspiracy theories) posited in one of his lengthy diatribes against Christians who reject eternal security:

          "If I cannot do good works to get saved, then how can I do bad works to lose salvation?"
          If I am understanding the author correctly, then I take it that he is saying that works either control everything in regards to our salvation or they do not matter at all. But this would only be the formation of a false dichotomy, since there is another approach that we can take on the relationship between good works and justification.

          The reason that we cannot merit eternal salvation with God in heaven is that we have fallen short of His eternal glory. Mankind is under condemnation due to having a stained record. That is one of the devastating consequences of the fall. We need the perfect righteousness of Christ and His atonement in order to be saved (Galatians 3:8-9). We are redeemed in the Lord Christ Jesus alone. We absolutely need His imputed righteousness, and must trust in His work alone if we wish to have the benefits of the cross applied to us.

          Notice what the Lord Jesus Christ affirmed during His sermon on the mount regarding the sins of adultery and murder:

          "You have heard that the ancients were told, ‘You shall not commit murder’ and ‘Whoever commits murder shall be liable to the court.’ But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be guilty before the court; and whoever says to his brother, ‘You good-for-nothing,’ shall be guilty before the supreme court; and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ shall be guilty enough to go into the fiery hell." (Matthew 5:21-22)

           "You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery’; but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart." (Matthew 5:27-28)

          The context of this passage from the Sermon on the Mount is about adhering to the spirit of the law, not just the letter. God does not only examine behavior, but also the heart. People practice various sins because their hearts are already dedicated to unrighteousness. Our deeds are the evidence of our current spiritual state. Folks like King David did not "practice" adultery and murder, but got ensnared by those sins during a period of spiritual vulnerability.

          God disciplines those who He loves, just as a father does a son who is guilty of some wrongdoing (Deuteronomy 8:3-5; Proverbs 3:12). A God who is willing to lay down His life for sinners is not going to instantaneously give up on somebody. That is totally unrealistic. A person does not reach sinless perfection upon conversion. We still struggle with a sin nature, but the grace of God, which we do not deserve, does transform our hearts. How God dealt with Israel in the Old Testament is a testimony to His patience. King David himself serves as a display to the greatness of His mercy.

          The loss of salvation is not caused by a single bad work, but is a slow, gradual process that takes place over time. We do not do bad works to "get unsaved." Bad works are the evidence, not the cause, of a declining faith or hardening heart. Our works are symptomatic of our spiritual state. God examines our hearts. We are justified by faith, apart from the merit of any good works (Romans 4:2-8). We are saved by faith in Christ. We obtain mercy from God through heartfelt repentance.

          It is technically difficult for a Christian to lose his or her salvation. God is slow to anger (Psalm 145:8). He is rich in mercy (Ephesians 1:7-8). He does not will that any man perish (2 Peter 3:9). He is faithful even during our times of unfaithfulness. The Holy Spirit continually convicts the conscience of sin. But He can still cast off bad branches. Christians do not lose their free will upon conversion. People can and do, though as shocking or unfortunate it may seem, abandon heartfelt convictions. God forbid that a believer apostatize from the faith, but it is an undeniable reality. He certainly has the power to keep us, but will not force people into heaven. That would not be love. We were not created to be robots or puppets, but His children.

          If a Christian holds fast to the gospel by faith, and that alone, then he or she can rest assured of entering Paradise in the afterlife. We are kept in by the Holy Spirit in the same way that we entered the Kingdom of God: faith (Galatians 3:1-6; Colossians 2:6-7). In other words, we are both justified and sanctified by faith. Justification is not analogous to some sort of a wage that we can deplete by sin. We are not saved by "remaining faithful," but by trusting in the atonement of Christ. We are either fully a part of God's kingdom or not a member at all. There is no in-between. Belief in eternal security is not by any means a requirement for subscribing to Sola Fide. David J. Stewart also made this problematic statement in his article:

          "I am going to Heaven, regardless of how I live. But you say, that's crazy! No! That's Bible!"

          The above quoted excerpt is contrary to everything that Scripture says concerning sanctification in the Spirit. It actually proves the author being critiqued to be a false teacher, as he openly and boldly promotes a license for immorality. Such is an utter disgrace to the Cross of Christ. Contrast the words of David J. Stewart with the Apostle Paul's words in Romans 6. Ironically, Mr. Stewart derisively condemns just about everybody who disagrees with him even on the smallest of matters. His overall mentality lacks consistency and is despicable. If the lives of Christians are characterized by sin and display not even the slightest desire for repentance and growth in sanctification, then yes, they have sufficient reason to question the validity of their profession of faith.

          Let it be said that it is indeed possible for one to "walk away" from or forfeit salvation. There are simply too many warnings for Christians to be on guard against apostasy (1 Timothy 4:16, 2 Timothy 1:14; 2 Peter 2:1). We are not called to sit back and relax. Notice that God said in the Old Testament of certain Jews that if they continued in their rebellion against Him, He would "love them no longer" (Hosea 9:15). There is nothing that we can do to merit our salvation. God's Law demands perfect obedience. Yet, we have all sinned. That is why mankind has incurred condemnation by the Law. At the same time, God the Father out of His unfathomable love for us sent God the Son into the world to make atonement for our sin. We must place our trust in His work alone for justification. We can indeed have great assurance of salvation. It is a present tense possession. It is not as though we have to wring our hands every time we make a mistake or be in constant fear. We do not have to walk on eggshells. We all have fallen short of God's glory. We are all liable to error. But we should never put off repenting.

          There is no opportunity for boasting in the Christian life because justification is by faith alone (Ephesians 2:8-9; Titus 3:4-7). The Christian life is not devoid of good works, but evidenced by good works (Ephesians 2:10). A saving faith is accompanied with a desire to know and serve God. We are saved only by the blood of Jesus Christ. Conversion of heart does change a person. The Holy Spirit keeps us in the kingdom of God by the same way that we entered, faith. But we must make a choice to be saved. We are responsible for our stay here on earth. We who profess Christ need to periodically examine ourselves in light of God's Word (2 Corinthians 13:5). Phil Johnson accurately describes the "ministry" of David J. Stewart as follows:

          "The first thing you'll notice about this site is how cluttered, disorderly, and tawdry it looks. The content is no different. It's as if the page was constructed with a deliberate effort to eliminate anything that might edify or encourage. This is a seriously ugly muddle of fundamentalist pet issues, 911 Truther propaganda, and various amateur analyses—all thrown in your face with high-decibel, high-velocity force. The webmaster here seems drawn to every repugnant trope that has ever been commandeered in the name of religion—unsightly images, distasteful themes, loathsome tales, sinister gossip, and sensationalized headlines ("Satanism In The Vatican!") He blends these themes with favorite points of fundamentalist controversy and presents them in a way that seems carefully calculated to maximize the shock value. This is not ministry; it is exploitation. It's a lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing profitable. Some people insist that the only way to reach our generation with the gospel is by laboring to seem as cool or as non-confrontational as possible. This guy seems to think the goal is the opposite: to be as cheesy and offensive as possible. Both strategies are equally misguided."


  1. Again, here is my refutation of the idea that one can lose their salvation.

  2. Hi Jesse, I don't want you and me as brothers in Christ to constantly debate this topic. There is value in the discussion, however, there is so much we as believers must be about that we can lose focus of those things and just debate among one another rather than accomplish His will for our lives. Since you asked that I comment, I that saves is an unconditional surrender faith, not a simple belief. One cannot go back from unconditional surrender, and if they do, then by definition, their surrender could not possibly have been unconditional. Most of the arguments given by Calvinists are in response to those who believe you can lose your salvation, not by choosing to abandon it, but by not doing enough works to keep it. Most who don't believe in eternal security do not believe as you do...that one chooses to forfeit their salvation, so understand the reaction is against those who teach that one can accumulate enough "bad works" unintentionally, that it results in the loss of salvation, often unbeknown to the individual. Your position is more unique, and while I disagree with it because of my fundamental view of the definition of faith, I can agree to disagree because your position does not cause Christians to live in constant fear of whether today they accidentally lost their salvation. I really hope to enjoy conversation on other topics with you my brother!

  3. Hello Jesse,

    Super-great article! Very well done!